Pages

Monday, January 6, 2014

Judge: Chicago’s ban on gun sales unconstitutional | theGrio

Judge: Chicago’s ban on gun sales unconstitutional | theGrio
Anthony (no last name available) looks over a memorial for his friend Eugene Clark, 25, who was shot and killed Saturday on July 22, 2013 in Chicago, Illinois. In another violent weekend, Chicago had at least 6 people killed and 22 wounded by gunfire. (Photo by Scott Olson/Getty Images)
JohnButts@JBMedia - Reports:
"Well Folks Here Is One For You, It Seems To Me And I Am Only Given My Opinion And Thoughts On This Gun Control Mess."
What Some People View As A Problem To Having A Right To Have A Gun Or Not Have One, It Seems To Me That The Underlying Question Is To Gun Control Is It Whether A Person 'Dies By The Right To Have A Gun Or Dies By A Gun', That's Just My Thoughts.
It Seems That Guns Don't Stop Killing, Guns Have Not Deterred Crime, Killings, Loss Of Property Or Person, And If It Did Then Why Is What I Just Said True And If You Think I Am Lying Then All The News Media, Government Reports, Police Reports, NRA Is Lying.
You Know Cain Used The Jawbone Of A Camel To Kill His Brother Abel, So I Guess If You Take Away All The Guns The People Will Kill A Jackass And Take His Jawbone And Still Kill People, That's Just My Opinion.
I Read Somewhere In A Book And It Have A Passage That Read Something Like This: 'if you live by the sword, then you will surely die by the sword'
That's Just My Opinion And Thoughts!
Now Here Is The Story — A federal judge on Monday overturned Chicago’s ban on the sale of firearms, ruling that the ordinances aimed at reducing gun violence are unconstitutional.
U.S. District Judge Edmond E. Chang said in his ruling that while the government has a duty to protect its citizens, it’s also obligated to protect constitutional rights, including the right to keep and bear arms for self-defense. However, Chang said he would temporarily stay the effects of his ruling, meaning the ordinances can stand while the city decides whether to appeal.
Broderick Drew, a spokesman for Chicago’s law department, did not immediately return telephone calls for comment.
The decision is just the latest to attack what were some of the toughest gun-control laws in the nation. In 2010, the U.S. Supreme Court struck down Chicago’s long-standing gun ban. And last year, Illinois legislators were forced by a federal appeals court to adopt a law allowing residents to carry concealed weapons in Illinois, the only state that still banned the practice. The resulting state law largely stripped city and officials of surrounding Cook County of their authority to regulate guns, which especially irked officials in Chicago, where residents had to apply for concealed-carry permits through the police chief.
Chang’s decision came in a lawsuit filed by the Illinois Association of Firearms Retailers and three Chicago residents. The judge noted Chicago’s ban covers not only federally licensed firearms dealers, but also gifts among family members, all in the name of reducing gun violence.
Chang wrote that the nation’s third-largest city “goes too far in outright banning legal buyers and legal dealers from engaging in lawful acquisitions and lawful sales of firearms, and at the same time the evidence does not support that the complete ban sufficiently furthers the purposes that the ordinance tries to serve.”
Chicago, which last year had more homicides than any city in the nation, still has an assault weapons ban.
City officials have long acknowledged the ban on gun sales has been ineffective, because sales are legal in some surrounding suburbs and states.

No comments:

Post a Comment