Pages

Monday, March 31, 2014

America May Have Just Unveiled a New Weapon to Combat Russia's Action in Ukraine

America May Have Just Unveiled a New Weapon to Combat Russia's Action in Ukraine
JohnButts@JBMedia - Reports:
There are lots of weary eyes looking at the situation between Russia and Ukraine. Russia has already annexed Crimea, and a very sizable army has been deployed to the Russian-Ukranian border that has many worried there may be more to the conflict. There is little appetite for a military response from America and its Western allies, and the response so far has some concerned it isn't enough to make any significant impact. Recently, though, the U.S. government did something it hasn't done in almost 25 years, and it could be an indication of how the U.S. will retaliate.
Source: U.S. Department of Energy.
The world's most powerful weapon: Oil
For several years, the United States' Strategic Petroleum Reserve, or SPR, has rarely garnered any attention, mostly because it is used so sparingly. Since 1977, when it was implemented, there have been only a handful of times that it has tapped, the last being in 2011, when President Obama authorized the release of 60 million barrels in response to the crisis in Libya.
That is what makes the recent "test sale" of 5 million barrels of oil so intriguing. This is the first time since 1990 that there has been a test sale from the SPR, which just happens so coincide with the time there was concern that Iraq could invade Saudi Arabia. While correlation does not always mean causation, the release of those 5 million barrels coincided with a 2.7% drop in crude oil prices.

Hit 'em where it hurts -- their wallet
It's no secret that Russia is one of the world's leading exporters of oil and gas. It exports about 8.5 million barrels per day of crude oil and refined petroleum products, as well as 19.3% of the worlds natural gas exports. What is less known is Russia's nearly crippling dependence on oil and gas revenues to pay the bills. The $662.3 billion petroleum industry in Russia represents 26.5% of GDP, and over 50% of the federal government's revenue comes from royalties. Unfortunately for Russia, its oil doesn't come cheap. Even with oil at $100 per barrel and current production levels, the country projects only 1.8% GDP growth, and if oil were to fall any lower it would force massive federal budget cuts.

So what exactly would releasing oil from there do? Let's say U.S. production and imports from Canada and Mexico were to hold place. The U.S. would need to release about 950,000 barrels per day to meet all of
the United States' current demand. Based on the SPR's 727 million barrels in storage, we could do this for well over two years and drive down global prices significantly. Surprisingly, though, we don't even need to go to that extreme. According to economist Phillip Verleger in a recent Quartz article, if the U.S. were to release only 500,000 barrels per day from the SPR, it would lead to a $10 drop in oil prices and would cost Russia $40 billion in sales. At this pace, we could maintain this pace for more than four years and could potentially cause Russia's GDP to drop by 4%.

We've done it before, but it will be harder this time 
 There are two ways to describe the collapse of the Soviet Union: The storybook version is about the arms race that eventually bankrupted the USSR and led to its evenutal collapse. The one that doesn't get told as
much, though, is the other half of what caused the bankruptcy: cheap oil. In a coordinated effort with Saudi Arabia to increase global crude production, inflation-adjusted oil prices fell 69% between 1981 and 1988. This resulted in massive revenue shortfalls for the USSR and became a critical piece that eventually led to its downfall.

The challenging part about such a move this time around is that Saudi Arabia may be less willing to go along with the idea. The Kingdom has been very much against Russia's support of the Syrian regime and even  gave some veiled threats about potential terrorist attacks at the Sochi Olympics if it maintained its stance there. However, it has become more and more dependent on high oil prices to maintain its budget as well. According to the International Monetary Fund, Saudi Arabia needs oil at $85 per barrel to keep its own budgets in line. So even though a major price drop would hurt Russia more than the rest, Saudi Arabia may not have the stomach for it, either.

What a Fool believes
There have been several calls from members in Congress to expand the amount of LNG export licenses to take a bite out of Russia's dominance in the global gas markets. It sounds all well and good, but the first US LNG export facility is not expected to come online until the middle of 2015 and the rest until later in the decade. In fact, opening the SPR would actually serve a very similar purpose, because Russian natural gas prices are indexed to the price of oil.

Using the Strategic Petroleum Reserve as a political tool is something that we have basically never done since it was created following the oil embargos of the 1970s, and using it in this situation would cause some harm to U.S. oil producers because it would lower the price of oil and by default the returns on that barrel of oil. However, most of the shale resources in the U.S. would fare much better than Russia in the event of lower oil prices, and it should be something considered if the situation in Ukraine were to elevate any further.

The energy landscape is changing radically. Oil exports from America continue to rise as our country gains energy independence. And there is one company front and center that is poised to make its investors rich. Warren Buffett has already committed to it, and you can too. Click here to learn about this company in the Motley Fool's special report: OPEC's Worst Nightmare.
 

Tuesday, March 25, 2014

Obama: No, Romney Was Wrong. Russia Is Weak, Not Strong. - Yahoo News

Obama: No, Romney Was Wrong. Russia Is Weak, Not Strong. - Yahoo News
JohnButts@JBMedia - Reports:
During a press conference today in The Netherlands, ABC's Jonathan Karl asked President Obama if he
thought "Mitt Romney had a point" when he said in 2012 that Russia was America's "number one" geopolitical foe. Obama took advantage of the question to slam his current political opponent, Vladimir Putin.

Karl's question began with a challenge. "In China, Syria, and Egypt — and now in Russia — we have seen you make strong statements and issue warnings that have been ignored. Are you concerned that America's influence in the world, your influence in the world, is on the decline?" And, he added, in light of recent developments, have you rethought your critiques of Romney? During the 2012 campaign, Romney called Russia "our number one geopolitical foe," later downgrading that to a geopolitical foe as The Washington Post notes.
The Obama campaign quickly criticized Romney for the statement, but Putin's invasion of Crimea has led to a round of told-ya-so's from Romney and his supporters.
Obama's Romney response could have served as a response to both of Karl's questions. From a rough transcript:
The truth of the matter is that America has got a whole lot of challenges. Russia is a regional power that is threatening some of its immediate neighbors — not out of strength, but out of weakness. ...We have considerable influence on neighbors. We generally don't need to invade
them in order to have a strong cooperative relationship with them. The fact that Russia felt the need to go in militarily and lay bare these violations of international law indicates less influence, not more.

My response [to Romney] then continues to be what I believe today, which is: Russia's actions are a problem. They don't pose the number one national security threat to the United States.
Instead, Obama said, his main concern was "the prospect of a nuclear weapon going off in Manhattan," bringing the conversation back to the security summit that he was in The Netherlands to attend.

It's a clever argument, one that was also reflected in his answers to questions about the role of sanctions in bringing Putin to heel. Obama's stated goal is to "spend as much effort on bolstering the economy inside of Ukraine" as possible, increasing its global strength against what he depicts as Russia's weakness. And that work only happens, he said, in concert with other countries. "What the United States has been consistently been able to do and continues to be able to do is mobilize the international community around a set of principles and norms," he said in response to Karl. "We may not act militarily, but that does not mean that we don't steadily push against those forces that would violate those principles and ideals we care about."
On his personal index of foes, Obama claims that Putin isn't at the top. Fair enough. But his answer to Karl suggests that Romney doesn't even make the list.

Monday, March 24, 2014

Reid slams GOP over Crimea; Senate bill advances - Yahoo News

Reid slams GOP over Crimea; Senate bill advances - Yahoo News
JohnButts@JBMedia - Reports:
Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid said Monday that Republicans may have helped Russia annex Ukraine's
Crimean Peninsula, delivering a surprisingly sharp attack just before lawmakers advanced a bill authorizing sweeping U.S. sanctions on Russia and $1 billion in loan guarantees to Ukraine.

The 78-17 procedural vote in favor of the legislation spared President Barack Obama an embarrassing setback while he lobbies U.S. partners on a weeklong trip overseas to punish Moscow for its annexation of the Crimean peninsula. But Reid's tone suggested a compromise with the Republican-controlled House may prove difficult, prolonging Congress' inaction in the two weeks since Russian President Vladimir Putin's
military intervention.
 Reid focused his ire on the GOP senators who blocked the bill before lawmakers went on break March 14. He urged them to consider "how their obstruction affects United States' national security as well as the
people of Ukraine" and said their delay of any congressional action "sent a dangerous message to Russian leaders."
"Since a few Republicans blocked these important sanctions last work period, Russian lawmakers voted to annex Crimea and Russian forces have taken over Ukrainian military bases," Reid said. "It's impossible to know whether events would have unfolded differently if the United States had responded to Russian aggression with a strong, unified voice."
The Nevada Democrat's charge came despite widespread bipartisan support for providing Ukraine with much-needed economic assistance and hitting Putin's government with sanctions. And GOP Senate aides noted the House has passed different legislation, meaning the Senate bill could not have become law before recess anyhow. They blamed Reid and Democrats for blocking the Senate from taking up the House legislation.
Reid "sounds completely unhinged," fired back Michael Steel, spokesman for House Speaker John Boehner, R-Ohio. "The House has acted, and is continuing to act, in a reasonable and responsible way to give the White House the tools it needs to hold President Putin accountable." The Senate bill includes a proposal from one of Obama's fiercest critics, Republican Sen. John McCain, enabling the president to impose economic penalties on Russian government officials for corruption even within Russia's own borders. The broadness of the authorization is unprecedented for Russia, even if applying the sanctions would be at Obama's discretion.
But it also includes GOP-opposed reforms of the International Monetary Fund, which the United States, Europe and others are working with to stabilize Ukraine's economy. The IMF's 2010 reforms increase the power of emerging countries in the lending body and shift some $63 billion from a crisis fund to a general account it can use for economic stabilization operations around the world.

Republicans have long spurned the administration's attempt to ratify the IMF changes, saying they'd increase the exposure of U.S. taxpayers in foreign bailouts managed by the fund. Making the shift now, opponents such as Sens. Rand Paul and Marco Rubio argue, also would marginally increase Russia's voting power over the fund's finances.

The Obama administration and Democrats counter that unless the U.S. approves the new rules, Washington will lose its influence at the IMF and hamper the body's ability to avert economic meltdowns in places precisely like Ukraine. The U.S. is the only major country that has yet to sign off. With American officials warning that Russia could opt to expand further into Ukraine, McCain urged his colleagues to look beyond the IMF provisions. He stressed the need for Congress to pass the Senate bill quickly.

"If we do not send this message now," McCain said, "Putin will be encouraged to enact further acts of aggression against Crimea and in the region."

Reid interpreted the logjam differently. He said Republicans blocked the bill before Congress' one-week recess to "protect the anonymity of their big-money donors" such as the Koch brothers, two of America's wealthiest men who've strongly supported conservative causes. He was referring to an unsuccessful attempt by some Republicans to include an amendment to the bill halting new IRS regulations on groups claiming tax-exempt status.

"Republicans objected to moving forward with this aid package unless Democrats agreed to allow the Kochs and billionaires like them to continue to anonymously spend millions trying to buy America's democracy," Reid said. "It's hard to believe. But that's the truth."

Nevertheless, a majority of Senate Republicans joined Democrats in passing the cloture vote Monday evening, setting the stage for full Senate passage of the bill later this week.

House members are preparing to write their own Russia sanctions bill at a meeting of the Foreign Affairs committee Tuesday, supplementing the aid legislation they passed earlier this month. Neither includes any
reference to the IMF.

Tuesday, March 18, 2014

Documentary Questions Why Black Men Are Vilified In U.S. | News One

Documentary Questions Why Black Men Are Vilified In U.S. | News One
JohnButts@JBMedia - Reports:
Why are Black men so misunderstood? “Afraid of Dark,” an upcoming documentary, takes a hard look at the challenges and injustices Black men face daily just for being in the skin that they’re in, according to Indiewire. Writer, director, and Brooklynite Mya B. questions the many cultural stereotypes that Black men in AmeriKKKa deal with by taking viewers on a two-hour journey to explore how they have been victimized, vilified, marginalized, and criticized.

The filmmaker takes a creative look historically at the poignant depictions of the Black male and then breaks them down — thru scientific racism — uncovering how Black men “have been affected by those particular stereotypes throughout history, and how the subconscious belief in them have contributed to violence and the incarceration of Black men at disturbing rates.”

Mya B. also interviews three generations of Black men within her own clan in addition to rappers, actors, academicians, and politicians who describe their own dances with racial injustice.

Why make such a groundbreaking film that takes the subject of Black masculinity to even greater depths?

Mya B. told Indiewire, “I wanted to analyze the damaging stereotypes of Black men, which has led to them being murdered and criminalized. I also wanted Black men to receive their glory outside of all the bad things you hear in the media and profile the amazing Black men I know and who are in our communities. More importantly, I wanted people to never forget those Black youth and men who never got justice in death by
honoring them in the film to keep them alive in our memories.”

No release date has been mentioned, so be on the lookout.

Check out the “Afraid of Dark” trailer below:

Monday, March 17, 2014

Putin recognizes Crimean independence - Yahoo News

Putin recognizes Crimean independence - Yahoo News
JohnButts@JBMedia - Reports:
Ignoring the toughest sanctions against Moscow since the end of the Cold War, Russian President Vladimir
Putin recognized Ukraine's Crimean Peninsula as an "independent and sovereign country" on Monday, a bold challenge to Washington that escalates one of Europe's worst security crises in years.


Related Stories

The brief decree posted on the Kremlin's website came just hours after the United States and the European Union announced asset freezes and other sanctions against Russian and Ukrainian officials involved in the Crimean crisis.
President Barack Obama warned that more would come if Russia didn't stop interfering in Ukraine, and Putin's move clearly forces his hand.
The West has struggled to find leverage to force Moscow to back off in the Ukraine turmoil, of which Crimea is only a part, and analysts saw Monday's sanctions as mostly ineffectual.
Moscow showed no signs of flinching in the dispute that has roiled Ukraine since Russian troops took effective control of the strategic Black Sea peninsula last month and supported the Sunday referendum that
overwhelmingly called for annexation by Russia. Recognizing Crimea as independent would be an interim step in absorbing the region. Crimea had been part of Russia since the 18th century, until Soviet leader
Nikita Khrushchev transferred it to Ukraine in 1954 and both Russians and Crimea's majority ethnic Russian population see annexation as correcting a historic insult.
Ukraine's turmoil — which began in November with a wave of protests against President Viktor Yanukovych and accelerated after he fled to Russia in late February — has become Europe's most severe security crisis in years.
Russia, like Yanukovych himself, characterizes his ouster as a coup, and alleges the new authorities are fascist-minded and likely to crack down on Ukraine's ethnic Russian population. Pro-Russia demonstrations have broken out in several cities in eastern Ukraine near the Russian border, where the Kremlin has been massing troops.

Fearing that Russia is prepared to risk violence to make a land-grab, the West has consistently spoken out against Russia's actions but has run into a wall of resistance from Moscow.

Reacting to Monday's sanctions, Russian Deputy Foreign Minister Sergei Ryabkov declared that they were
"a reflection of a pathological unwillingness to acknowledge reality and a desire to impose on everyone one-sided and unbalanced approaches that absolutely ignore reality."

"I think the decree of the president of the United States was written by some joker," Russian Deputy Prime
Minister Dmitry Rogozin, one of the individuals hit by the sanctions, said on his Twitter account.

The White House imposed asset freezes on seven Russian officials, including Putin's close ally Valentina
Matvienko, who is speaker of the upper house of parliament, and Vladislav Surkov, one of Putin's top ideological aides. The Treasury Department also targeted Yanukovych, Crimean leader Sergei Aksyonov and two other top figures.

"We need to show solidarity with Ukraine, and therefore Russia leaves us no choice," Polish Foreign Minister Radoslaw Sikorski told reporters in Brussels.

Despite Obama's vow of tougher measures, stock markets in Russia and Europe rose sharply, reflecting relief that trade and business ties were spared.

"I guess the market view is that Russia forced their case in Crimea, pushed through the referendum, and the
Western reaction was muted, so that this opens the way for future Russian intervention in Ukraine," said Tim Ash, an analyst who follows Ukraine at Standard Bank PLC.

On Monday evening Vice President Joe Biden was heading to Europe to meet with NATO allies. He was headed for Warsaw, where he was slated to meet Tuesday with Polish Prime Minister Donald Tusk and President Bronislaw Komorowski. He was to meet separately with Estonian President Toomas Hendrik Ilves. In Lithuania, Biden planned to meet with President Dalia Grybauskaite and Latvia's President Andris Berzins.


"We came back home to Mother Russia. We came back home, Russia is our home," said Nikolay Drozdenko, a resident of Sevastopol, the key Crimean port where Russia leases a naval base from Ukraine.

A delegation of Crimean officials was to fly to Moscow on Monday and Putin was to address both houses of parliament Tuesday on the Crimean situation, both indications that Russia could move quickly to annex.

In Kiev, acting President Oleksandr Turchynov vowed that Ukraine will not give up Crimea.
"We are ready for negotiations, but we will never resign ourselves to the annexation of our land," a somber Turchynov said in a televised address to the nation. "We will do everything in order to avoid war and the loss
of human lives. We will be doing everything to solve the conflict through diplomatic means. But the military threat to our state is real."

In a statement Monday, Russia's Foreign Ministry urged Ukraine's parliament to call a constitutional assembly that could draft a new constitution to make the country federal, handing more power to its regions. It also said the country should adopt a "neutral political and military status," a demand reflecting Moscow's concern that Ukraine might join NATO and establish closer political and economic ties with the EU.
Russia is also pushing for Russian to become one of Ukraine's state languages, in addition to Ukrainian.
In Kiev, Ukraine's new government dismissed Russia's proposal as unacceptable, saying it "looks like an ultimatum."
Ukrainian Foreign Minister Andriy Deshchytsya visited NATO headquarters in Brussels to request technical equipment to deal with the secession of Crimea and the Russian incursion there.
NATO said in a statement that the alliance was determined to boost its cooperation with Ukraine, including "increased ties with Ukraine's political and military leadership."

Sunday, March 16, 2014

U.S. rejects Crimea vote | MSNBC

U.S. rejects Crimea vote | MSNBC
JohnButts@JBMedia - Reports:
The White House has strongly condemned a vote on whether Crimea should join Russia, calling it “contrary to Ukraine’s constitution” and Russia’s recent actions “dangerous and destabilizing.”

“The international community will not recognize the results of a poll administered under threats of violence and intimidation from a  Russian military intervention that violates international law,” a  statement from the White House Press Secretary said. “No decisions about the future of Ukraine should be made without the Ukrainian government.

Residents of Crimea voted Sunday on a referendum on whether to join Russia or become an autonomous state. Exit polls saw 95.5% of voters in support of annexation, according to local reports.

American and European officials have dismissed the referendum as illegitimate, and the U.S. has said it will not recognize the outcome.

“As the United States and our allies have made clear, military intervention and violation of international law will bring increasing costs for Russia - not only due to measures imposed by the United States and our allies but also as a direct result of Russia’s own destabilizing actions,” the White House said.

More than 1.8 million citizens were considered eligible to cast votes in the referendum at 1,205 polling places. Local officials expected turnout to reach 80 percent, according to reports by RIA Novosti newswire.

After returning from a visit to the U.S., Ukraininan Prime MInister Arseny Yatseniuk told a cabinet meeting that politicians in Crimea who called for the vote would face dire consequences. ”We will find all of them - if it takes one year, two years - and bring them to justice and try them in Ukrainian and international courts. The ground will burn under their feet,” he said.

Ukrainian Defense Minister Ihor Tenyukh called on Russian forces to withdraw in an interview with the Interfax-Ukraine news service and said that Ukrainian forces were prepared to mobilize.

“Russia must immediately withdraw its military troops out of  Crimea and the Black Sea Fleet to their places of permanent deployment  as it is backed by certain basic agreements between Ukraine and Russia.
Ukrainian navy headquarters was and is going to stay in Sevastopol. As  for the National Guard, a few days ago, more than 40,000 people have  already signed up and volunteered for the military commissariat,”
Tenyukh said.

For more on Crimea see our photo essay: ‘Unwanted people:’ A portrait of Crimea”
Tensions between Ukraine and Russia have been high since November, when protests erupted in Kiev over Ukrainian President’s Viktor Yanukovich’s decision to reject warmer relations with the European Union. Protests reignited in February, and Yanukovich left office on February 22.

The vote took place as Russian military forces entered and took control of a Ukrainian village near the Crimean border Saturday. The Russian military took control of key Crimean infrastructure last month and has maintained a presence since then.

White House senior adviser Dan Pfeiffer said Sunday on Meet the Press that Russian President Vladimir Putin will face serious consequences if he does not back down.

“They know there are costs to their actions here. The more they escalate, the longer this goes, the greater those costs will be,” Pfeiffer said. Looking forward, Pfeiffer said Putin is at a crossroads. “Is he going to continue to further isolate himself, further hurt his  economy, further diminish Russian influence in the world, or is he going to do the right thing?”

After the votes are counted, Republican Sen. John McCain of Arizona said on CNN’s State of the Union„ the U.S will need “a fundamental reevaluation of its relationship with Putin.”

If Russia does not stop its advances, McCain said that the U.S. could institute economic sanctions, but that military assistance is not on the table. “It doesn’t mean boots on the ground,” McCain said, “but maybe delivering some humanitarian aid.”

A $1 billion aid package to Ukraine is awaiting a vote in Congress. A vote is expected when legislators return from break.

Sergei Lavrov, the Russian foreign minister announced in a press release Sunday that he and Secretary of State John Kerry had spoken about the situation in Ukraine. “Sergei Lavrov and John Kerry  agreed to continue their working contact in finding ways of regulating  Ukraine through the speedy launch of constitutional reforms, supported  by the international community in a commonly accepted format and with
respect to the interests of all the regions of Ukraine,” the release  said.

Friday, March 14, 2014

John McCain Unloads On Senate Republicans: 'I Haven't Been Embarrassed This Way'

John McCain Unloads On Senate Republicans: 'I Haven't Been Embarrassed This Way'
JohnButts@JBMedia - Reports:
Sen. John McCain (R-Ariz.) took to the Senate floor Thursday to castigate fellow Republicans for holding up aid to Ukraine over provisions boosting funding for the International Monetary Fund.
"What has happened? Where are our priorities? Is the IMF, no matter whether it's fixed or not fixed with this legislation, more important than the lives of thousands of people? Is that what we're talking about here?" he
said.
He invoked Republicans' secular saint -- President Ronald Reagan. "I will say to my friends who were objecting to this -- and there are a number of them on my side -- you can call yourself Republicans. That's fine, because that's your voter registration. Don't call yourself Reagan Republicans. Ronald Reagan would never, would never let this kind of aggression go unresponded to by the American people."
He went on, "So now because of an IMF fix, or a campaign finance fix, we are now going to reject a piece of legislation that was done in a bipartisan basis with the leadership of the chairman who I see on the floor, of which I'm proud, ranking member, Senator Corker of Tennessee, and we're going to say 'no.' And you know the most ridiculous thing about all of this is? The majority leader has filed cloture. We have well over 60 votes. So we're going to be back in about 11 or 12 days, whatever it is. Cloture will have been expired. It's well over 60 votes. And we will pass this."
 "I've been embarrassed before on the floor of the Senate, I will tell the president. But I haven't been embarrassed this way about members of my own party," said McCain.
McCain has long been hawkish toward Russia and is not afraid to take on his fellow Republicans. But McCain's remarks stand in contrast to House Speaker John Boehner (R-Ohio), who said the IMF provision
to boost funding had nothing to do with the Ukraine bill. Ukraine has long been a recipient of IMF loans, and is negotiating a new package of loans with the IMF.

The Senate is likely to vote on the Ukraine aid package when it returns from recess next week. McCain is leading a congressional delegation to Kiev in a show of support for the new government.

Monday, March 10, 2014

Opposing Stand Your Ground in North Carolina | Southern Coalition for Social Justice

Opposing Stand Your Ground in North Carolina | Southern Coalition for Social Justice
Crystal M. Hayes: North Carolina Peace Action Opposes “Stand Your Ground”
 JohnButts@JBMedia - Reports:
North Carolina Peace Action is non-profit education and advocacy organization that envisions a world where all beings are free from the threat of war and oppression.  We stand together as one human family to resolve conflicts peacefully in all our endeavors and support human rights.  Our mission is the abolition of war and oppression around the world, and this must extend to building a culture of peace, and uprooting the causes of all kinds of war and oppression including violence in our own communities.
NCPAOne of those main causes is the widely held, but mistaken belief that violence is redemptive, that violence saves lives.  This belief is apparent in the passage by 25 states, including North Carolina, of “Stand Your Ground” laws (SYG), which allow a person to kill another
person, claim self-defense, and be protected from prosecution. This is especially true in states like our home state of North Carolina that also allow persons to carry concealed weapons.  These troubling laws encourage gun owners to use their weapons if they fear or believe that another person might harm them rather than retreating, or seeking a nonlethal alternative.  As we have seen, in the senseless tragic killings of Trayvon Martin and Jordan Davis, both shot to death before their 18th birthdays, SYG laws are making our communities even less safe, and is a painful reminder that racism and racial stereotypes remain a debilitating aspect of our culture.

In the early years of the twentieth century, our Congress failed to pass laws making lynchings of African Americans illegal.  Ida B. Wells led the anti-lynching movement of the 20th century. She was a fierce racial justice advocate who documented the horrific ritual lynchings of African Americans in the United States, and her work illustrated that lynchings were used as a tool by white supremacists to terrorize and punish the African American community for competing with whites. Now, in the 21st century we have SYG, essentially a new form of lynching masquerading as self-defense. We believe that fighting to repeal Stand Your Ground is the anti-lynching movement of the 21st century, and in the spirit of Ida B. Wells, NC Peace Action strongly urges our legislatures to repeal SYG in every state where this law exists.

In cultures where racism still prevails, there is racial disparity in how these laws are applied.   A study by Richard Florida  (The Atlantic Cities in July, 2013) shows that in states with “Stand Your Ground” laws, 35.9% of white on Black shootings are deemed self-defense, but only 3.4% of Black on white have the same verdict—11 times more likely to be self-defense in white on Black shootings.

Equally important is the systemic inequalities inherent in the double standard of gun use and SYG. When a young African American mother from Florida, Marissa Alexander fired a warning shot in the air to fend off
her abusive husband—someone who had threatened her life on numerous occasions—she could not have known that she would be sentenced to prison for 20-years.  After mass protest and mobilization in support of Alexander, she won a new trial in December 2013, but not before she spent a year in prison. She is now under house arrest awaiting a new trial and Florida prosecutor, Angela Corey, has announced that she will
now seek 60 years in prison if Alexander is convicted again. Marrissa killed no one. She fired a warning shot, but unlike George Zimmerman who was acquitted for killing Trayvon Martin and is free and clear today, Marissa Alexander faces 60 years in prison.

Stand Your Ground is bad policy and we implore all of our friends, allies, and peers who believe in peace, justice, democracy, and freedom to stand with NC Peace Action as we “Stand Our Ground” against a system that provides a license to kill Black and Brown people with impunity.

The preamble to our constitution states that we are striving to “form a more perfect Union, establish Justice, ensure domestic tranquility…” Stand Your Ground laws are based on the worst kinds of fear rather than
the common good and do not contribute to justice, or a more perfect union, or tranquility in our nation.

We can do better.  We must do better. Morality and the need for all people to live peaceably together demand it.
Submitted by Crystal M. Hayes, MSW. Crystal is Assistant Director
of North Carolina Peace Action and Clinical Assistant Professor at
North Carolina State University in the Department of Social Work


 Crystal

Is Ben Carson the new Herman Cain? | theGrio

Is Ben Carson the new Herman Cain? | theGrio
JohnButts@JBMedia - Reports:
By all accounts, Ben Carson wowed them at the CPAC, the Conservative Political Action Conference, this past weekend in Washington.
 The retired Johns Hopkins neurosurgeon rallied the troops with a fiery speech and he came in third place in the CPAC straw poll behind Senators Rand Paul (R-Kentucky) and Ted Cruz (R- Texas), a strong showing.

Might Dr. Carson be the conservative movement’s political reincarnation of Herman Cain?  It certainly looks that way.
I should begin by saying I liked Herman Cain when he ran for president.  Although I did not agree much with what he had to say, he was a showman, with an affable personality.  If nothing else, he was entertaining, with his “9-9-9” tax plan, and his ability to put a smiley face on the most abhorrent Tea Party policies imaginable.  And in the end, he had about as much of a chance of winning a ticket to the White House as one of those pizzas he used to sell, and we all knew it.

Nevertheless, the party faithful like to keep at least a few articulate black folks around, individuals who position themselves as the living embodiment of Horatio Alger up-from-your-bootstraps folklore, and cheerleaders for the government’s retreat from any positive role in advancing society, in helping the vulnerable, and promoting the common good.  After all, they did it all by themselves, they made it up the
ladder, so why can’t you (you meaning government-dependent black people)?

In the end, Cain and others of his ilk were never really intended to attract more African-Americans to the conservative fold, as their primary purpose is to validate bad policies in the eyes of those who already subscribe to those policies.  Perhaps they will even attract a few unsuspecting moderates and swing voters who want to be reassured the GOP is a safe place.

Herman Cain provided the entertainment the last presidential election cycle, but Ben Carson is a step above.  As an acclaimed neurosurgeon and pioneer who was the first to separate conjoined twins joined at the head, Dr. Carson is no joke.  Back in my younger days I remember reading about Dr. Carson with a sense of pride.  From a career standpoint, he is the real deal, which is precisely why he ought to know better.  When you’re born and raised in Detroit and you’re sent to Yale, you have an obligation to know better.

Dr. Carson is not necessarily the most compelling or gifted speaker, but he comes off as far more substantive than Cain, which is why he will likely get some mileage in 2016.  In his 20-minute speech, he railed against political correctness and the liberal media, and claimed that a number of his past statements had been
distorted.  Carson referred to America as “a land of dreams,” as if the U.S. is some type of Disneyland where magical things happen.  He proclaimed marriage is between a man and a woman, adding that “Of course gay people should have the same rights as everyone else.  But they don’t get extra rights,” which drew enthusiastic applause from the CPAC crowd.  Carson provided the standard Tea Party fare, reiterating his comparison of homosexuality to bestiality, and prior remarks that Obamacare is the worst thing to happen since slavery. “I miss what medicine used to be,” Carson lamented.”’I don’t miss what it has become.”

Dr. Carson said that people on the left “repeat these lies over and over again because they cannot argue the actual facts.”  And he called for unity among conservatives, urging the crowd to vote Republican even if their candidate fails to win a primary.

A black doctor who is against people having medical care, and tries to make intolerant, discriminatory policies acceptable by putting a black face on them?  Dr. Ben Carson is made to order.  A political action committee to draft him for president has raised $2.8 million in six months.  Like Herman Cain, he may be unelectable, but Dr. Carson could make the 2016 primaries all the more interesting.

Senate Democrats aim ire at rich, obscure brothers - Yahoo News

Senate Democrats aim ire at rich, obscure brothers - Yahoo News
JohnButts@JBMedia - Reports:
Democratic Senate candidates, facing withering criticism on the national health care law, are gambling they can turn voters against two billionaire brothers funding the attacks — even if few Americans would recognize the pair on the street.
In an accelerating counteroffensive stretching from the Senate chamber to Alaska, Democrats are denouncing Charles and David Koch, the key figures behind millions of dollars in conservative TV ads hammering Democratic candidates and their ties to President Barack Obama. Democrats depict the Kansas-based Koch (pronounced "Coke") brothers as self-serving oil barons who pay huge sums to try to "buy" elections and advance their agenda of low taxes and less regulation. And they're using unusually harsh language in the Senate.
Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid says the Koch-financed ads against Democrats and the health care law contain lies "made up from whole cloth." "I guess if you make that much money, you can make these immoral
decisions," Reid, D-Nev., said in a recent Senate speech. "The Koch brothers are about as un-American as anyone I can imagine." Republican Sen. Jerry Moran of Kansas defended the Kochs and compared Reid's
remarks to the communist-baiting tactics of Joseph McCarthy.
The Democrats' strategy depends on persuading enough Americans that the Koch brothers, who rarely appear in public, are so significant and troubling that voters should reject the Republican candidates benefiting from their ads. "When you connect the dots for the people," said Democratic adviser Chris Lehane, "the light bulb comes on." In a time of stagnant working-class wages, they note, the Kochs have grown stupendously wealthy while pushing their conservative-to-libertarian causes. Forbes magazine ranks the brothers as tied for sixth among the world's richest people, worth $40 billion each.
Democratic pollster Geoff Garin says Americans, when given this basic information, believe the brothers are trying to elect a government that helps them at the expense of less wealthy people, who would fare better under Democratic policies. "The polling we've done shows very clearly that people think these unlimited
expenditures don't have anything to do with free speech and have everything to do with skewing what goes on with American government and American politics," said Garin, who advises Reid. To see the Kochs spend millions to try to privatize Social Security, reduce taxes on oil or "undermine environmental regulations is troubling to voters," he said.
In North Carolina — where Democratic Sen. Kay Hagan is enduring an avalanche of Koch-related ads denouncing her support of Obama's health policies_attacks on the Koch brothers will simply draw more attention to their message, said the state's other senator, Republican Richard Burr.
"I don't think there's any resentment to a group or individual spending their money to tell people what's really going on," Burr said. Charles Koch, 78, and David Koch, 73, inherited a small oil company from their
father. They expanded worldwide into chemicals, textiles, paper and other products, building a hugely profitable and privately held conglomerate. Long active in conservative politics, they seized on the 2010 Citizens United court ruling that allows unlimited corporate spending on political campaigns, often without disclosing donors. They helped found Americans for Prosperity, which reported spending $122 million on elections in 2012. With this year's election still eight months away, the Koch network already has spent $15 million on Senate races, mostly attacking Democrats over Obamacare. Republicans need to gain six seats to control the 100-member Senate. Republicans note that liberal billionaires also spend heavily on politics. They point to environmentalist and hedge-fund manager Tom Steyer, who says he will spend at least $100 million on congressional and gubernatorial elections this year.
But Steyer is still examining the field, months after Koch-funded ads began pounding Democrats like Hagan. And Democrats say Steyer will not benefit financially by pushing his climate change agenda, whereas the Kochs' campaign for lower taxes and less regulation would help big businesses like theirs. Reid, who admits he's no gifted orator, is leading the chorus with bombasts from the Senate chamber.
"Think about what an America rigged by the Koch brothers would look like," he said in one recent speech. "The Koch brothers don't care about creating a strong public education system in America," Reid said, nor a "strong safety net of Medicare and Social Security" or "a guarantee of affordable, quality health insurance for every American. Why? Because the Koch brothers can afford to buy all those benefits and more for themselves." Reid told reporters: "I'm going to keep talking about them every chance I get because America should not be for sale." Democratic candidates nationwide are picking up the theme, said Matt Canter of the Democratic Senatorial Campaign committee. "We've done extensive polling on this," Canter said. "Voters understand that Republicans are pushing a policy agenda that is good for their benefactors, the Koch brothers."
"The message we've tested does not rest on them knowing who Charles and David Koch are," Canter said.
In state after state, Democrats are berating the Kochs in speeches and fundraising appeals.
"To overcome Charles and David Koch's shadowy, fear-mongering TV ads, we have to work harder and be smarter," says a fundraising letter for Sen. Mary Landrieu, D-La. Koch industries spokesman Steve Lombardo defended the ads. He said, "it is unfortunate that Harry Reid is focused on attacking citizens of the
United States rather than the problems facing this country." He said Koch companies employ more than 60,000 Americans. "I think the American people are smart and will see through this tactic," Lombardo said.

Wednesday, March 5, 2014

(5) Curtis Everette Gatewood

Curtis Everette Gatewood



JohnButts@JBMedia - Reports:
Curtis Everette Gatewood
Curtis Everette Gatewood
ADEGBILE FALLS VICTIM TO 'DIVISION', 'CIVIL RIGHTS' VIOLATIONS AND IN-'JUSTICE'  AS HE SOUGHT TO BECOME DIRECTOR OF THE 'JUSTICE' DEPARTMENT'S 'CIVIL  RIGHTS' 'DIVISION' (shaking my head)

Ironically Atty. Debo Adegbile, became a blatant victim of injustice as he sought to head the Civil Rights Division of the 'Justice' Department. Ironically the brilliant and well-qualified candidate to serve as leader of the country's Civil Rights Division had is 'civil rights' violated today. This was only another example of the 'FOXES' who are  posing as a legitimate 'News' organization, when they have long used its powerful platform to produce widespread venom and gutter-journalism only to give credibility to ignorance, hate, lies, and the worst form of high profile race-baiting since 'Birth of a Nation.'
Atty. Debo was denied his position basically for proving he was competent. As an Atty. Debo was punished for providing a competent and effective defense for Mumia Abu Jamal, a former Black Panther Party member who was charged with killing a White police officer. Race-baiters have long called for Jamal to be put to death, while protesters and others within the justice community have called for Jamal's release and freedom. With competent legal representation from those such as Adegbile, while in prison and not yet free, Jamal was saved and protected from deathrow.
However, FOX News, saw this as the perfect time to do what they do best- race-bait and blind the public with the blindfold of ignorance and racism. Evidently, it worked. This is a sad day from America. This proves, we can never underestimate the massive spread of insanity caused by race-baiting, large scale lie-telling, and gutter journalism.
Afterall, what should we expect if America will continue to leave a raving hate-hungry FOX inside the henhouse of America's psyche. It is a sad day when the process to appoint a leader for the Civil Rights
Division of the Justice Department is blatantly stained by 'civil rights' violations , 'division', and IN-justice!

(95) Curtis Everette Gatewood

Curtis Everette Gatewood
Curtis Everette Gatewood

JohnButts@JBMedia - Reports: 
Curtis Everette Gatewood
WOE UNTO THE WARMONGERS - LET'S STOP THE WAR BEFORE IT STARTS

The warmongers are crawling out of the hellholes and seem to want President Barack Obama to go straight to war with Russia. According to their rhetoric, President Obama is 'weak-kneed' unless he goes to war right away. These people have never seen a war they didn't like because they obviously, like someone else I know - 'came but to kill, and to steal, and to destroy.' WOE UNTO THE WARMONGERS.

Interestingly, they never have money to feed or provide health care or child care for a poor child, but they always find the money to send someone's child off to kill or be killed. They never have money for books, bread, or building up, but they always have money for bombs, bullying, and blood which flows like an endless river. According to the warmongers the term 'wasteful spending' do not apply to the billions which are needlessly 'wasted' to 'waste' and kill the lives of a million or more human being. According to the warmongers the only way to 'waste dollars' is to spend them to assist the poor, to free the oppressed people of color, or to invest in our struggling Americans. WOE UNTO THE WARMONGERS.

The warmongers will begin waving their flags while claiming to 'love' their country in the name of 'patriotism' while showing no 'love' for the irreplacable American lives their reckless wars will kill or cause to return home in bodybags or without limbs and/or with irreparable mental disorders such as PTSS. The big-money warmongers and war contractors will be the ones bringing home the money bags. We are suddenly suppose to forget about the multi-billions Bush/Cheney flushed down the commode of Haliburton based upon lies that will forever be soaked in the blood of over 100,000 (American & Iraqi) beautiful lives. WOE UNTO THE WARMONGERS.

The warmongers' will be first to chant 'SUPPORT THE TROOPS!' But these warmongers do not 'support the troops' once they have been used like toilet paper to clean the malodorous rear-end of a messy war and left to die overseas or left to be homeless or supportless if they ever make it home. According to the warmongers, the only way we can 'support the troops' is to give them a gun and send them off to die. WOE UNTO THE WARMONGERS.

Keep mind, the warmongers are many of the same people who claim to be 'pro-lifers', but they are obviously pro-liars, because if you ever support a deadly war, you can never ever truthfully say you are 'pro-life.' War kills in more ways than we could ever imagine. Nonetheless, many of the so-called 'Christian' politicians will come down with a case of SELECTIVE-SCRIPTURAL-AMNESIA at the time of war.

For example, when warmongers begin to rally - there will be no mentioning of 'Turn the other cheek' unless the poor and oppressed are the ones being killed by those in power. The warmongers will suddenly forget the commandment which says 'THOU SHALT NOT KILL.' They have twisted and turned the scriptures in such a way until according to the warmongers 'thou shalt not kill' only applies to women and the fetus inside their pregnant bodies. WOE UNTO THE WARMONGERS. WOE UNTO THE HYPOCRITES. LET'S STOP THE WAR BEFORE IT STARTS.

When will we learn? THERE IS NO SUCH THING AS 'WINNING' A WAR AS PRECIOUS, INNOCENT, IRREPLACABLE LIVES ARE LOST! AMERICA LOSES EACH TIME WAR IS DECLARED. WHEN THE FIRST LIFE IS LOST, SIMULTANEOUSLY WE HAVE ALSO 'LOST THE WAR.










Tuesday, March 4, 2014

Dream Defenders Protest Stand Your Ground Laws - The Root

Dream Defenders Protest Stand Your Ground Laws - The Root
JohnButts@JBMedia - Reports:

The Dream Defenders are sticking to their goal of making sure their voices are heard by protesting inside Florida’s Capitol in Tallahassee Tuesday morning, the first day of Florida's 2014 legislative session.

The group, an organization of young people fighting systemic injustice toward communities of color, stepped into the spotlight after the shooting death of Trayvon Martin by George Zimmerman. It has been especially vocal about “Stand your ground,” as well as police brutality in Florida. Over the last two years, the Dream Defenders have held countless protests and sit-ins at the Capitol, and now the group is taking an even bigger stand.

"Why are we here? We are here to tell you what's really going on - we call that the State of the State" #visitfl pic.twitter.com/qWdFhGsIVY
 Today’s
protest will not only feature the father of Israel Hernandez, an 18-year-old boy who was “tasered” to death by Miami police in 2013, but also youths from universities and high schools around Florida. By using
the hashtag #GoodKidsMadCities, the Dream Defenders hope that their stance will resonate on social media and will encourage others to participate.

"This year we refuse to sit back and allow our youth to be pushed from schools into prisons, or shot down in the streets," said Sherika Shaw, one of the Dream Defenders’ field organizers. “The color of our skin will not deny our youth the opportunity to thrive in this state. If our communities come together, we can build the power to create change.”

Woke up this morning and my mind was set on #Trayvon. #VisitFL #GoodKidsMadCities pic.twitter.com/Tu5yIlnY5K
The Dream Defenders are urging Florida residents to tweet them using the #goodkidsmadcities and #visitfl hashtags to highlight their own version of Florida’s State of the State address video, which Gov. Rick Scott will be making later this afternoon.

Takeover of entrance to state of the state- passing out legislative priorities #visitfl #GoodKidsMadCities pic.twitter.com/oUNWV5Qz8f

The Dream Defenders (@Dreamdefenders) March 4, 2014
Yesha Callahan is a full-time writer and single mother living in  Columbia, Md. She has written for BlogHer, Jezebel and The Grio and has  been seen on HuffPost Live and TV One’s NewsOne Now With Roland Martin. She is currently the managing editor of Clutch magazine and is a former comedy and politics writer for BET’s Don’t Sleep! Hosted by T.J. Holmes.




Monday, March 3, 2014

Blacks in Western Art: The True Meaning Behind the Miracle of the Black Leg - The Root

Blacks in Western Art: The True Meaning Behind the Miracle of the Black Leg - The Root

 Villolbo.BlackLeg
JohnButts@JBMedia - Reports:
This image is part of a weekly series that The Root is presenting in conjunction with the Image of the Black in Western Art Archive at Harvard University’s W.E.B. Du Bois Research Institute, part of the
Hutchins Center for African and African American Research.


In a startling re-enactment of a pious medieval legend, two doctors perform a miraculous act of surgical healing. Their intervention transcends the parameters of medicine to address the role played by race in the history of early modern Europe.

The scene represents a posthumous miracle of two early Christian saints, the twin doctors Cosmas and Damian. This particular presentation of the story takes the form of a carved and painted relief from a now
displaced altarpiece. The work was originally set up, appropriately, in the funerary chapel of a doctor, located in the convent of San Francisco in the Spanish city of Valladolid.

Though Cosmas and Damian are said to have been martyred under the Roman emperor Diocletian in the late third century, the story of the black leg first appears in their hagiography a thousand years later. It is part of the Golden Legend, a collection of engaging accounts of the deeds of Christian saints compiled by the Dominican monk Jacobus de Voragine in the later 13th century.

The story of the black leg relates a wondrous act that took place in a church dedicated to the saints in Rome. Shortly after its dedication in the early sixth century, the sacristan, or custodian, of the church became crippled with an ulcerous leg. As he lay in his bed, he dreamed that the two renowned healing saints appeared beside him, holding medical instruments and an ointment jar. After consulting with each other, they decided to replace the diseased leg with that of a black man, described in the account as an Ethiopian who had died the day before and been buried in another church in the city.

In this relief, the corpse is prominently represented in the right foreground for narrative convenience. The operation was carried out with success, and the sacristan’s leg was buried with the body of the black man. When the sacristan awoke, he leaped from his bed in joy, running to show his new leg to his family and friends. The contrasting color of the limb seems not to have mattered either to the sacristan or to the story’s author.

The role of the black man in the miracle exists within the highly conflicted perception of blackness that had developed within Christian theology during the early Middle Ages. On the one hand, black people could symbolize the ever present threat of demonic forces. Fully countering such negative connotations, however, was the simultaneously emerging characterization of blacks as stalwart exemplars of Christian virtue. Their origins go all the way back to the beginning of Christianity, in the biblical person of the Ethiopian eunuch, actually a high-ranking official at the royal court in Nubia. Also from the tradition of Scripture came the queen of Sheba, as well as the black king who bore the gift of myrrh to the Christ child at his birth.

For Isidro de Villoldo and his contemporaries, the Ethiopian in the miracle of the black leg takes his place among these more optimistic evocations of blackness. The story expressly points out that he was interred in one of the most important churches in Rome, where he would have received the holy sacrament of burial. Dressed in a richly worked garment, he seems to have been a person of high status and, like the Ethiopian eunuch himself, a member of the extended Christian community.

The excision of his leg for the purpose of healing can be regarded as an unusual example of both inclusion and posthumous charity, rather than an egregiously callous act of exploitation. This sympathetic relationship is reinforced compositionally by the identical alignment and similar poses of the bodies of donor and recipient.

In our own times, not surprisingly, the role of the black man in the miracle has provoked quite a different response. The enduring legacy of slavery, with its desire to control the black mind and body, has largely
overtaken the previously established, positive notion of blackness in European thought to impose a new, tortured identity upon the Ethiopian donor. He is viewed as a living, suffering victim, emblematic of the
thousands of actual black people living in Spain and the New World by the mid-16th century, as well as of the countless others to follow.
Page 1 of 2